Thursday, September 30, 2010

Achieving

"Herbert Sobel made Easy Company."

Captain Sobel was a demanding, motivated company commander who was in the right place and time to forge one of the finest companies in the U.S. Army -- he was also truly hated by his men and officers for being petty, arbitrary, and (unforgivably) his lack of judgment. Then a subordinate and later the company commander, Dick Winters saw it as a result of Sobel's rash decision making -- acting without reflection or consultation. A near mutiny while the company was in England that finally resulted in Sobel losing his company. This conflict is at the core of the first part of Stephen Ambrose's book Band of Brothers.


Whether you teach, lead, or command make sure your followers know what they're supposed to do before they're supposed to do it.


But no amount of trust, or fear, will make people do what they don't know how to do.

Teaching people how to do things is relatively easy, and a personality like Sobel's can, by threat of punishment, force people to practice manual skills and simple yes/no decision making to achieve higher proficiency. The quality of Easy Company's initial training allowed them to do it better then most, and established a esprit de corps that kept passing down solid training and high expectations as replacements continually came into the unit once they entered combat.

True leadership requires developing the trust of the subordinates (as well as superiors) that replaces fear of failure with confidence to follow orders. Much of this blog will focus on this trust building side -- particularly how to determine and articulate the right goals -- but some housekeeping is first in order to provide some definitions for the "achieving" side of the diagram

Skills are discrete items, as is information. Being able to read is a skill, which is much handier when you have information that tells you the hours and location of the library.



Tasks are steps of a bigger plan accomplished by skills. Reading and highlighting a specific book is a task.

Tactics are a set of tasks that accomplish an objective. Studying is a tactic to pass a test -- it uses many tasks (read several books, review notes, attend study group, etc). Cheating would be a different tactic. Altering the test is another, albeit rare, tactic (see KOBAYASHI MARU...James T. Kirk solution).

An Objective is a measurable, significant accomplishment. Passing or failing a class is measurable and significant. Parts of an objective, such as passing individual tests in a course, are milestones -- they measure your progress towards the objective and give you the opportunity to adjust.

Make sure the skills, competency with tasks, and understanding of tactics is in place before you ask people to achieve the objectives you've set; and make sure you measure your progress towards those goals so you can take corrective action before you miss an objective.

Sobel was able to get his men to be capable of greatness, but it took someone else to lead them there.

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Making Decisions

What is it, aside from luck, that separates the good from the very good, and the very good from the great?


Set the right goals and achieve them. This blog is the collection of ideas I've found while studying what influences deciding which goals to set and how to achieve them.

The chart below outlines the thought and execution process:

The name.

Every blog needs a good title.

"Drivethedogs" comes from story of General Israel Putnam.

Israel "Old Put" Putnam was a celebrity in his day. His service in the French and Indian Wars -- from being in Roger's Rangers to shipwrecking in the Caribbean -- had earned him much respect and many friendships. Weary of the steady stream of visitors to his homestead, his wife convinced him to move to their household to center of town and open a tavern, so they could at least profit from their hospitality.

The morning of April 20th, 1775 he was plowing a field behind that tavern when a messenger arrived with word of the previous day's Battle of Lexington and Concord. As the senior general of the Connecticut Militia, he left the plow in the field and rode on horseback first to Governor Trumbull's War Office in Lebanon, Connecticut for a war council, then back to Brooklyn, then to Cambridge, finally arriving in Concord in the wee hours of the morning. He rode one hundred and thirty miles in eighteen hours, including the time spent in meetings -- a remarkable feat for a man of fifty seven.(1)

Here's a man on the verge of greatness, with plenty of friends, lots of trust, in good health. Memorable enough for equestrian statutes in his home town, for a statute in the park adjoining the state capitol, Putnam State Park on the western side of the state is named after him, as well as the Town of Putnam near me.

We even have a really big equestrian statute of him in the center of my town:


Most school kids are taught the saying, "Don't fire until you see the whites of their eyes!" but few can attribute it to General Putnam. While not a footnote of history, he never made it into the category of the best remembered generals -- the realm of Washington, Greene, Knox.

What is it that makes that difference?

By the time of the Battle of Bunker Hill, Putnam had a commission as Major General (third in seniority to Washington). Colonel Prescott with a regiment of Massachusetts militia had managed to occupy Bunker and Breed's Hill under cover of dark and fortify them. The British attack focused on Breed's Hill, and at great cost to the British managed to drive Prescott's men off the hill.

In retreat Prescott encountered Putnam, "Why did you not support me, General, as I had reason to expect from our agreement?"

"I could not drive the dogs up!" replied General Putnam.

The incensed Colonel Prescott retorted, "If you could not drive them up, you might have led them up!" (2)

What is it, aside from luck, that separates the good from the very good, and the very good from the great?

----------
Footnotes:
1) During the heyday of the U.S. Cavalry it was expected a healthy troop could, in an emergency, cover one hundred miles in twenty four hours.

2) Historical Magazine, June 1868